Récits d´insertion de jeunes et régimes de temporalité Time regimens and young people’s narratives about entering the working world
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte revient sur l’analyse récemment republiée (Analyser les entretiens biographiques, Presses de Laval, 2004) d’un corpus d’entretiens de jeunes racontant leur insertion, en France, au début des années 90. Il ré-interroge ces entretiens sous l’angle des temporalités mises en œuvre dans les quatre types de discours qui sous-tendent ces récits. S’appuyant sur le concept de formes d’historicité issu de l’épistémologie de l’histoire (Kosselleck, Hartog...), il distingue quatre régimes de temporalités selon les relations des jeunes au passé, au présent et à l’avenir. Le régime utopique est de type eschatologique chez les jeunes qui dissocient totalement leur passé de galère et leur espoir de salut grâce à un Autrui puissant. Le régime passéiste est celui des récits de rêve de la petite entreprise indépendante, du métier ou de l’artisanat caractéristique du travail masculin d’hier. Le régime futuriste est celui des jeunes les plus favorisés énonçant un projet et les étapes de sa réalisation. Le régime présentiste est celui des jeunes femmes enfermées dans leurs rôles de salariées non qualifiées et sans carrière et de mères assujetties aux tâches domestiques. The authors return to their recently republished analysis of a body of interviews with young people talking about their professional insertion in France in the early 1990s (Analyser les entretiens biographiques, Presses de Laval, 2004). They question those interviews afresh from the point of view of the temporalities that intervene in the four types of discourse underlying the narratives. Taking off from the concept of historic forms found in the epistemology of history (Kosselleck, Hartog..), they distinguish four regimens of temporality according to the way the young people relate to the past, the present and the future. The utopian regimen is eschatological for those who dissociate themselves totally from a past of suffering and hope to be saved by some powerful Other(s). The passeistic (backward looking) regimen appears in dreams of an independent small business, of a craft or job typical of the male occupations of yesteryear. The futuristic regimen belongs to the most privileged youths who describe their project and the different steps needed to make it come true. The present regimen is that of young women locked into their positions as non-specialized employees or mothers tied to their domestic roles, with no particular career to look forward to.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".