MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023864550

Practical Implementation of Multi-UAV Flocking Path Planning

2021· dissertation· W7023864550 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsDownwashFlocking (texture)Motion planningAerodynamicsControl theory (sociology)Robot
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary objective of this thesis is to implement a flocking path planning algorithm in the three-dimensional dense environment to take into account the aerodynamics downwash effect. A method to model the downwash force generated by the quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and its effect on the neighboring UAVs is developed. A novel adaptive UAV model is proposed to optimize the path planning while minimizing the downwash impact by adjusting the UAV model zone size. The virtual zone around an UAV for collision-free path planning is modified from a standard spherical body to a proposed adaptive cylinder then to an adaptive cuboid. The cylinder height and the cuboid size vary based on the UAV circumstance and the predicted downwash impact. The flocking algorithm is modified for the adaptive model. The models are simulated and compared via Python and the Gazebo and Robot Operating System (ROS) simulation platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207