Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our Trade with the WorldFor Canadians the most urgent necessity of the post- war period is to be able to earn a decent living.The farmer's main problem is to get a good price for his goods, so that he can live well and give his family a chance.The industrial worker wants a steady job, so that he can have a good standard of living and make use of his abilities.The question of full employment is indeed the core of our post-war problems.Exchange The key to full employment is just this : where are Economy the products of our labour going to be marketed?The lumberman who produces lumber has to be able to sell it, so he can get other goods and services in exchange.The farmer who produces wheat has to be able to sell his wheat so that he can buy machinery for his farm, education and medical services for his children and all the products that make up our modern standard of living.We no longer live in a self-sufficient age when we all grow our own food, spin our own clothes.We are in the age of division of labour, when most people do highly skilled work and exchange their specialized produce and skills for goods from other people.We have to sell what we produce so that we can get what we need in exchange.Yet with Canada this business of exchanging our products is not merely a domestic concern : we sell so many of our goods out- side of Canada and get so many of the things we need from abroad.We are in fact part of an international economy.It is necessary therefore when we talk of employment and prosperity for Canadians that we discuss not only what we can do at home, but also how we can regulate our trade with the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.388 | 0.141 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".