MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023874808

Penggunaan Kode dalam Bertransaksi Seks oleh Gigolo di Surabaya : Suatu Kajian Sosiolinguistik

2005· dissertation· id· W7023874808 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStylisticsBlock (permutation group theory)Work (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian yang berjudul "Penggunaan Kode dalam Bertransaksi Seks oleh Gigolo di Surabaya: Suatu Kajian Sosiolinguistik" ini, berusaha mengungkapkan bentuk-bentuk kode yang dipakai oleh gigolo dalam bertransaksi seks dan proses pembentukannya serta bagaimana fungsi dan pola pemaknaan dari kode-kode itu. Kode-kode itu berupa kode isyarat, kode sapaan, kode perkenalan, kode iklan, dan kode bahasa lainnya yang dipakai dalam bertransaksi seks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it