MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023893262

PAUSE-2-PLAY: A PILOT SCH∞L-BASED HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

2008· article· en· W7023893262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChildhood obesityProgram evaluationIntervention (counseling)Body mass indexPhysical activityPrimary preventionPilot programSchool health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pause-2-Play primary obesity prevention program was pilot tested in London, Ontario to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of providing the program to a sample of elementary school students in grades five and six. Pause-2-Play was a 12-week intervention program consisting of an in-class curriculum, and an after-school program aimed at increasing physical activity and reducing screen time. The implementation process and outcomes were evaluated using a pre- and post- design. School staff, participants, and parents of participants reported enjoying the program, and that children benefited from participation. Participation in Pause-2-Play resulted in significant improvements in percent body fat (p<0.05), fat-free mass index (p<0.05) and fitness (p<0.05). This program can be feasibly provided to school-aged children, resulting in improved health outcomes. Pause-2-Play could be used as a primary prevention tool against childhood obesity. Successful implementation holds the potential to help alleviate the burdens of childhood and adulthood obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207