Persistence and prevalence of the enzootic chytrid fungus, «Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis», in relation to amphibian population decline in Panama
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pathogenic chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, causes population decline and extinction of numerous species of tropical, principally montane, amphibians. Is B. dendrobatidis an enzootic pathogen emerging as a disease, or rather a novel invasive pathogen infecting naïve amphibians? Are only high-elevation amphibians susceptible to the pathogen? If the chytrid is enzootic, then it may be in the environment before or after epidemic decline and may infect both montane and lowland amphibians as well as other organisms. To determine distribution of the pathogen and corresponding anuran abundance, I established eight research sites of varying elevations and stages of epidemic infection from west to east, ranging from 45 m to 1215 m elevation throughout Panama west of the Canal. Differential infection susceptibility among anurans was addressed in relation to three ecological factors: anuran body size, season and habitat. Prevalence and infection intensity of the chytrid were determined at all sites and for all factors using sensitive DNA-based RT-qPCR amplification. Amphibian populations at all elevations and stages of decline showed at least some degree of chytrid infection, and the chytrid was found on reptiles. In addition to presence of the pathogen, effects of the disease chytridiomycosis were variably seen at all elevations. Habitat and season did not seem to have a strong effect on infection prevalence and/or intensity, but frogs did appear to show greater infection at smaller anuran body sizes. All of the above results are suggestive of an enzootic pathogen and perhaps only the current epidemic of chytridiomycosis disease is novel. Since the infection
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".