Pope Apologizes For Non-Apology, Millionaires Too Broke For Moon? 08.02.22
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In episode 1300, Miles and guest co-host Joelle Monique are joined by comedian and host of Never Seen It, Kyle Ayers, to discuss... Golf Fans Not That Into Saudi Arabian/Trump Sportswashing Tournament, The Pope's Canadian \\"Apology Tour\\" Didn't Go So Well, Wanna Get Away? Researchers Have Found A Nice Spot For Humans On The Moon and more!Golf Fans Not That Into Saudi Arabian/Trump Sportswashing TournamentThe Pope's Canadian \\"Apology Tour\\" Didn't Go So WellIndigenous people hope Pope Francis goes beyond apology after visit to CanadaCatholic dioceses previously failed to raise money promised to survivors. Will they now?Canadian government says pope's apology not enough for abuses of Indigenous childrenPope calls for 'serious investigation' into historic Catholic abuses of native CanadiansTranslation error behind Pope's call for 'investigation' into residential schools: organizersGift of headdress to Pope draws condemnation from some First Nations people in ManitobaResidential school compensation must be paid before any papal visit, say survivors, advocatesWanna Get Away? Researchers Have Found A Nice Spot For Humans On The MoonLISTEN: Mantra by Makaya McCravenSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.436 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".