PSYCHOLOGICAL PORTRAIT OF KUZBASS WOMEN ENTERING THE ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective – to study the psychological status of Kuzbass women entering the program of assisted reproductive technologies. Results. The study showed that the level of personal anxiety, as an individual characteristic of women, is higher before entering the protocol, in contrast to the respondents of the control group. The leading motives for pregnancy in this category of women were defined as «Pregnancy to preserve relationships» and «Pregnancy to satisfy the need for love». The motive «Pregnancy as a protest» was not relevant for the Ith group of subjects. 58 % of women before entering the protocol in an emotional attitude to future pregnancy and upcoming motherhood have minor symptoms of anxiety, according to the results of the projective technique. Conclusions. women of Kuzbass, before joining the protocol, are more anxious in personal terms, they have a higher need for love, which they want not only to receive, but also to give. It is important for them to be in a serious and reliable relationship with a man. In an emotional attitude to the upcoming pregnancy and motherhood, most of the subjects have minor symptoms of anxiety, and a quarter of them have a conflict with this condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".