MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7023993329

Réception télévisuelle et\n resocialisation des immigrants d’origine tunisienne à la société\n québécoise

2018· article· fr· W7023993329 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationPublic policyResearch methodologyNew immigrants
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article est tiré d’une recherche doctorale sur la contribution de la télévision à la resocialisation des immigrants d’origine tunisienne nouvellement établis au Québec. Les résultats de cette recherche, qui aborde la communication interculturelle en contexte migratoire à partir de la construction du sens des contenus télévisuels, révèlent que l’écoute télévisuelle expose l’immigrant à un univers complètement nouveau et peu compréhensible. Par conséquent, la télévision n’est que rarement mobilisée, au début du séjour, comme un moyen de resocialisation à proprement parler. Son usage et ses effets se confondent aux expériences sociales des immigrants qui n’ont pas été exposés aux produits télévisuels québécois avant d’arriver au Québec. Les immigrants d’origine tunisienne, davantage exposés aux produits télévisuels français, américains ou arabes, qui sont accessibles en Tunisie, appréhendent les contenus québécois à la lumière de leur culture télévisuelle multiple. Ils relèvent alors que la télévision québécoise se démarque notamment par son « québécocentrisme », tout en étant fortement influencée par les standards américains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)Same topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207