Políticas y programas implementados en Ecuador para tratar las deficiencias de micronutrientes en los últimos 15 años
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micronutrients regulate crucial homeosthatic processes in the human body and their deficiency can cause negative consecuences to health. Sicknesses resulting from those deficits represent a major part of the helath burden in children under 5 years and fertile-aged women around the world. That is the reason why laws were created to protect ans assure their weillbeing. Now a days there are many programs in Ecuador and worldwide to treat micronutrien deficiency that were created based on rules and objectives planted from international organizations and governments. Between those programs we find staple food fortification, micronutrient´s drops, micronutrient´s pills, home-fortification powders, and food focused interventions. Several programs have been implemented in Ecuador to treat micronutrient deficiency such as “Chis Paz”, “Mi papilla”, “Mi bebida”, etc. Nevertheless, significant progress has not been achieved so far. Poor implementation and lack of impact evaluation of programs is proposed as the main reason for this.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".