MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024007335

Políticas y programas implementados en Ecuador para tratar las deficiencias de micronutrientes en los últimos 15 años

2016· dissertation· en· W7024007335 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUSFQ Digital Repository (Universidad San Francisco de Quito) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenWorld Health OrganizationUNICEFWorld Bank GroupUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsLatin AmericansMicronutrientMicronutrient deficiencyFood security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Micronutrients regulate crucial homeosthatic processes in the human body and their deficiency can cause negative consecuences to health. Sicknesses resulting from those deficits represent a major part of the helath burden in children under 5 years and fertile-aged women around the world. That is the reason why laws were created to protect ans assure their weillbeing. Now a days there are many programs in Ecuador and worldwide to treat micronutrien deficiency that were created based on rules and objectives planted from international organizations and governments. Between those programs we find staple food fortification, micronutrient´s drops, micronutrient´s pills, home-fortification powders, and food focused interventions. Several programs have been implemented in Ecuador to treat micronutrient deficiency such as “Chis Paz”, “Mi papilla”, “Mi bebida”, etc. Nevertheless, significant progress has not been achieved so far. Poor implementation and lack of impact evaluation of programs is proposed as the main reason for this.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSFQ Digital Repository (Universidad San Francisco de Quito)Same topicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207