MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7024026524

Police-Generated Evidence in Bail Hearings: Generating Criminality and Mass Pretrial Incarceration in Canada

2023· article· en· W7024026524 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Criminal justiceRacismMass incarcerationRace (biology)Criminal law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Systemic racism in policing impacts many aspects of the criminal legal system including the system of judicial interim release. This paper traces the ways in which reliance on police-created evidence at bail hearings might contribute to mass pretrial incarceration in Canada which is disproportionately felt by Indigenous, Black, and marginalized people. The police synopsis and police-created criminal records are state knowledge created for state purposes. This state-created evidence in fact generates race and racialization; all of the structural inequalities built into the system of policing become relied on at bail hearings through police-created evidence which contributes to mass pretrial incarceration in Canada. In this way, policing contributes to the creation of “criminality” and it is Indigenous, Black and “vulnerable” people who disproportionately become criminalized and contained in jails. The paper concludes by pulling together the ways in which police-generated evidence constructs criminality and exemplifies how heavily weighted bail hearings are in favour of the state.\nLe racisme systémique dans le maintien de l’ordre a des répercussions sur de nombreux aspects du système juridique pénal, notamment sur le système de mise en liberté provisoire par voie judiciaire. Cet article montre comment le recours aux preuves créées par la police lors des audiences de libération sous caution peut contribuer à l’incarcération massive avant le procès au Canada, qui touche de manière disproportionnée les Autochtones, les Noirs et les personnes marginalisées. Le synopsis de la police et les casiers judiciaires créés par la police sont des connaissances étatiques créées à des fins étatiques. Ces preuves créées par l’État génèrent en fait le racisme et la racialisation; toutes les inégalités structurelles intégrées au système de maintien de l’ordre sont invoquées lors des enquêtes sur le cautionnement par le biais des preuves créées par la police, ce qui contribue à l’incarcération massive avant le procès au Canada. Ainsi, le maintien de l’ordre contribue à la création de la « criminalité »” et ce sont les Autochtones, les Noirs et les personnes « vulnérables » qui sont criminalisés de manière disproportionnée et emprisonnés. L’article conclut en rassemblant les moyens par lesquels les preuves générées par la police construisent la criminalité et illustrent la manière dont les audiences de libération sous caution sont lourdement pondérées en faveur de l’État.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)→Same topicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis→French-language works237,207→