Review of <i>The American West: Out of Myth, Into Reality</i> By Peter H. Hassrick & <i>Visions of the West: Art and Artifacts from the Private Collection of J. P. Bryan, Torch Energy AdvisorsIncorporated and Others</i> Edited by Melissa Baldridge, with an introduction by Patricia NelsonLimerick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WESTERN ART'S BIG TENT Western art continues on its own distinctive path: disdained and ignored by art critics, especially in the East; beloved by a huge public, especially in the West. Western art museums display their treasures, traveling exhibitions spread the word, and those with money vote with their wallets. If price is a gage of popularity, then historic and contemporary Western art has never been more popular. The American West: Out of Myth, Into Reality is the catalog of a remarkable achievement- a touring exhibition, featuring 127 works of Western art, that, from inception to realization, was mounted in just three years. The achievement is all the more remarkable because several major works are included. Its title may be a bit misleading, since Reality refers not to a more realistic vision of the Western past in all its diversity, but to the idea that the mythic substance of Western art constitutes a reality all its own. This reality encompasses the celebration of national progress, the identification of Western wilderness with a New World Eden, and the glorification of the Wild and Woolly West as a masculine domain. The proposed periodization-subdividing the nineteenth century into four "phases" ending with a nostalgic commemoration of the old frontier-is problematic. The fourth phase, after all, antedates the end of the frontier. This is why the short entry arguing for the noble savage as a post frontier construct cites a painting dating from 1847 as well as a bronze dating from 1898; obviously lamenting change and celebrating the uncorrupted nobleman of forest and prairie were constants in Western art. Otherwise, how could we account for the entire enterprise that brought George Catlin west in the 1830s? One inspired decision in this catalog was to use the talents of others in the program at the Charles M. Russell Center for the Study of Art of the American West at the University of Oklahoma, where Peter Hassrick, the exhibition's curator, served as director from 1998-2001. Following his extended introduction, Donna Davies, Stephanie Foster Rahill, and Bradley A. Finson contribute fifteen thematic commentaries. The seven by Rahill are sound, the seven by Finson more speculative. The "phallic butte" Finson detects in the foreground of Alfred Jacob Miller's Trappers Saluting the Rocky Mountains is a stretch, not only because a cigar is sometimes just a cigar, but because the formation in question does not meet the classic test for a phallic symbol: anything longer than is wide. I doubt that Indians were ever regarded as an "avaricious" foe (124), and Henry Farny's Rounded Up by God clearly shows a cowboy, not a cavalryman (142). Perhaps juggling works in the exhibition and commentaries in the catalog explains certain technical errors. The notes in the text after note 23 are misnumbered, while the painting described in the text on page 70, Albert Bierstadt's El Capitan, Yosemite Valley, California, is not the painting illustrated in the catalog as figure 19. Missteps aside, it is good to find a new generation of scholars grappling with the meaning of works once regarded as boringly literal and to see that the Western art tradition still invites scrutiny by inquiring minds. Visions of the West is concerned with a different kind of reality. It showcases an unorthodox corporate collection heavy in material culture and folk art and unusually representative of diversity through its Native American, Mexican, African American, and cowgirl objects. "Pluralism," according to its curator, Melissa Baldridge, is the Torch Energy collection's defining feature. Housed in Houston, it bears a strong Texas stamp, reflective of the tastes of the company's founder J. P. Bryan, who also collects rare Texana (unrepresented here) and firearms and spurs. The firearms are treated as the products of nineteenth- century industrial ingenuity and as works of art, while the spurs illustrate the dominance of the Hispanic tradition in shaping that supposedly most Anglo-American of cultural heroes, the cowboy. Nevertheless, guns and spurs (and cowgirl memorabilia, for that matter) challenge Baldridge's disdain for "cowboy art," a tradition she attributes to Frederic Remington and Charles Russell without knowing much about either evidently, since she has them converging thematically at the very point where they clearly diverge, in presenting "a simple drama where red and white square off in mortal combat" (x).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".