Preserve the transient and not only
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The urban area that is the subject of the study, is in the northern part of Bucharest. It is an area that used to be rural up to the end of the 19th century and became part of the city only after the urbanisation plan of the northern areas, when it was integrated in the “new” road system of bulevardul, which linked the city to the countryside. The regular weave of the boulevards - Bulevardul Aviatorilor, Iancu de Hunedoara and Calea Dorobantilor - defines the space where, starting from about 1985, the quarter was developed. The counterposition between these two green spaces, either public or private, and the solid structure of the buildings also leads the subject-user to considerations about temporality. The mutability of the greenery recalls the concept of transitory, meant not so much as its ontological meaning but as an aesthetic expression which communicates a condition of fleetingness, through specific expressive codes. Which aspect of our present allows picking up and modulating time, making its movement perceptible, better than nature? Then perhaps, the public greenery and the private one introduce with strength the space-time dimension, the feeling of the ephemeral in a place where, on the contrary, conveys values of substantiality, constructive solidity, balance, uniformity and individualism at the same time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".