Quel(s) rôle(s) pour l'agriculture urbaine à Montréal-Nord : perceptions et vision des résidents.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce document présente le contexte de recherche, la méthodologie, les résultats et quelques éléments d’analyse d’un stage réalisé à Montréal-Nord à l’hiver et au printemps 2013 dans le cadre de la maîtrise en études urbaines de l’Institut national de la recherche scientifique. Le stage réalisé auprès de l’organisme Parole d’excluEs avait comme objectif de mieux comprendre le potentiel de l’agriculture urbaine à Montréal-Nord, sous l’angle de la perception et des besoins de jardiniers de l’Îlot Pelletier. Pour ce faire, trois entretiens de groupe ont été réalisés avec des jardiniers de l’Îlot Pelletier, et, afin de comparer avec les perceptions de non-jardiniers, deux entretiens de groupe ont été réalisés avec des résidents de Montréal-Nord impliqués auprès du Centre d’action bénévole de Montréal-Nord. Ainsi, par le biais de mises en situation et de discussions de groupe, il a été possible d’identifier certains éléments qui semblent primordiaux pour ces résidents de Montréal-Nord dans le cadre d’un projet de jardinage collectif. Ainsi, au-delà de la production alimentaire, ces participants considèrent que les relations humaines et sociales qui sont possibles dans de tels projets sont essentielles. Afin d’assurer une plus grande pérennité au projet, mais aussi une meilleure accessibilité alimentaire dans le contexte nord-montréalais, plusieurs des participants aux entretiens proposent également d’intégrer des projets de jardinage collectif à d’autres projets, afin de créer un véritable système alimentaire à Montréal-Nord, ce qui permettrait de répondre à plusieurs des nombreux besoins identifiés par les résidents. This document presents the context, methodology, results and preliminary analysis of a research internship done in Montreal-Nord during the winter and spring of 2013, as part of a Masters in Urban Studies at the Institut national de la recherche scientifique. The internship was with the organisation Parole d'excluEs. The objective was to gain an understanding of the potential of urban agriculture in Montreal-Nord by looking at how it is perceived by the citizen-gardeners from Îlot Pelletier, as well as their needs. To reach this objective, three group interviews were held with gardeners from Îlot Pelletier and, to compare their views with those of non-gardeners, two interviews were realised with citizens from Montreal-Nord involved with the Centre d'action bénévole de Montréal-Nord. The interviews were conducted through situation tests and group discussions. They allowed several elements that seem essential to Montreal-Nord citizens in collective gardening projects to be identified. For most of the participants, food production is important, but even more so are the human and social relationships that these kinds of projects create. To make sure the project is sustainable, but also to have a better food access in Montreal-Nord, most of the participants suggest that the gardening projects be integrated into other projects in order to create a real food system in the neighborhood. This would answer many of the needs identified by the residents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".