MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024080444

Pour l’amour de la coupe et de la colle . GAUDREAULT, André et Laurent LE FORESTIER. De l’assemblage au montage cinématographique — Instauration et standardisation d’une pratique, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, coll. Cinéma et technologie, 2022, 370 p.

2023· article· fr· W7024080444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObject (grammar)Order (exchange)Limiting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour l’amour de la coupe et de la colle / GAUDREAULT, André et Laurent LE FORESTIER. De l’assemblage au montage cinématographique — Instauration et standardisation d’une pratique, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, coll. Cinéma et technologie, 2022, 370 p.. Un article de la revue Ciné-Bulles (Volume 41, numéro 1, hiver 2023, p. 3-56) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)Same topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207