MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024093362

Regioselective Activation Of Glycosyl Acceptors By a Diarylborinic Acid Catalyst

2011· dissertation· en· W7024093362 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodDiafiltrationFusible alloyTSG101LiquationDysgeusia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The realization that oligosaccharides play a central role in many biological processes has led to increasing interest in the preparation of synthetic targets for use in medical or biochemical research and drug discovery. The preparation of oligosaccharides from simple carbohydrate derivatives requires efficient methods for the construction of O-glycosidic bonds. Much effort has been made towards the development of selective methods for the preparation of oligosaccharide targets. The most common method to overcome the challenge of regioselectivity is the use of protecting group manipulations to suppress glycosylation at undesired positions. This is highly inefficient in terms of atom and step economy. Organoboron catalysis is a recent strategy that imparts regioselective activation of the equatorial hydroxy group of cis-vicinal diols towards functionalization. Following the initial findings that diarylborinic acid catalyzes the regioselective acylation of carbohydrate derivatives, an analogous method for regioselective glycosylation under Koenigs-Knorr conditions has been developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207