Quantifying the Mobility Benefits of Winter Road Maintenance – A Simulation Based Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A good understanding of the relationship between highway performance, such as crash rates and \ntravel delays, and winter road maintenance activities under different winter weather and traffic \nconditions is essential to the development of cost-effective winter road maintenance policies and \nstandards, operation strategies and technologies. This research is specifically concerned about the \nmobility benefit of winter road maintenance. A microscopic traffic simulation model is used to \ninvestigate the traffic patterns under adverse weather and road surface conditions. A segment of the \nQueen Elizabeth Way (QEW) located in the Great Toronto Area, Ontario is used in the simulation \nstudy. Observed field traffic data from the study segment was used in the calibration of the \nsimulation model. Different scenarios of traffic characteristics and road surface conditions as a result \nof weather events and maintenance operations are simulated and travel time is used as a performance \nmeasure for quantifying the effects of winter snow storms on the mobility of a highway section. The \nmodeling results indicate that winter road maintenance aimed at achieving bare pavement conditions \nduring heavy snowfall could reduce the total delay by 5 to 36 percent, depending on the level of \ncongestion of the highway. The simulation results are then applied in a case study for assessing two \nmaintenance policy decisions at a maintenance route level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".