Propuesta de dimensiones configurativas de la promoción de salud Proposal of configuration dimensions of health promotion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se fundamenta la importancia actual de las acciones de promoción de salud para la consecución de metas superiores, su desarrollo cualitativamente superior a través de la transformación de su conceptualización, desde la década del 20 del siglo pasado hasta la actualidad, la que se ha fortalecido con un cuerpo teórico metodológico, que posee principios y estrategias propias que confluyen como referente insustituible para la salud pública. Se analiza y clasifica el marco epistemológico de la promoción de salud, a partir de los ejes temáticos postulados en la I Conferencia Internacional de Promoción de Salud, celebrada en Ottawa, Canadá, en 1986, y las subsiguientes, así como la unidad dialéctica entre ellas, en aproximaciones teóricas que se definen como dimensiones configurativas, como son: la conceptual, la filosófica, la política, la social y la cultural, que transitan desde una perspectiva compleja y profunda, cuyos nexos son indisolubles, a la luz de los cambios socioeconómicos y políticos a nivel mundial. Los argumentos descritos demuestran que la promoción de salud constituye un arma de incuestionable valor para lograr mayor mejores políticas de salud, y posibilita una rápida comprensión de la temática, la que constituye la tercera función esencial de la salud pública, que ha pasado a ser parte de la agenda de las políticas públicas saludables, como la propuesta moderna de la promoción de salud. The current significance of health promotion actions are emphasized to realization of higher goals, its qualitatively higher development through a transformation of its conceptual character from the twenties of last century up nowadays, strengthed by a methodological theoretical body having own principles and strategies converging as a irreplaceable reference for public health. The epistemology framework of health promotion is analyzed and classified from the thematic axis postulated in I International Conference of Health Promotion helded in Ottawa, Canada in 1986 and the subsequent ones, as well as the dialectical unit among them, in theoretical approaches defined as configuration dimensions including: the conceptual, philosophic, politic, social and cultural types going from a complex and deep perspective, whose links are indissoluble in the light of the socioeconomic and politic changes at world level. Arguments described show that health promotion is a weapon of irrefutable value to achieve great and better health politics, and also make available a fast understand of the subject matter, being the essential third of public health, becoming part of agenda of healthy public politics, like a modern proposal of health promotion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.051 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".