MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024178948

THE ROLE OF AMPLITUDE ENVELOPE IN AUDIO-VISUAL PERCEPTION: TESTING THE EFFECT OF AMPLITUDE ENVELOPE IN SPATIAL VENTRILOQUISM

2016· dissertation· en· W7024178948 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMultisensory perception and integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsAmplitudeEnvelope (radar)IllusionPerceptionTwo-alternative forced choiceIntensity (physics)PsychophysicsActive listeningSound localizationAmplitude modulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world is filled with richly diverse sounds which we are able to perceptually distinguish using a variety of properties. One of these properties is the amplitude envelope, or the intensity of a sound over time. While it is common in the real world for sounds to have time-varying amplitude envelopes, the majority of sounds used in perceptual research have time-invariant or unspecified amplitude envelopes. The aim of the present thesis is twofold. Because many of the studies using time-invariant or undefined envelopes make use of very short sounds (below 100 msec), the first experiment aimed to determine the duration required for discriminating among three different envelopes: flat (invariant), ramped (increasing in intensity over time), and damped (decreasing in intensity over time). In Experiment 1, participants took part in a 2-alternative forced choice, psychophysical staircase paradigm in which they indicated which of two envelopes they thought they were listening to. Results showed that, when telling ramped tones apart from either flat or damped tones, participants showed discrimination thresholds below 50 msec, while they had thresholds of approximately 75-80 msec when differentiating flat from damped tones. Because amplitude envelope has been shown to impact audiovisual integration and the perceptual system is sensitive to interaural envelope differences when localizing sounds, the second experiment aimed to determine whether amplitude envelope could modulate the visual bias present in spatial ventriloquism, an audiovisual illusion where the perceived location of a sound is influenced by the location of a visual stimulus. In Experiment 2, participants performed a psychophysical staircase task which measured their accuracy in localizing sounds with flat and damped envelopes, with or without a simultaneous flash on the screen in front of them. Results showed that, at durations above the envelope discrimination thresholds found in Experiment 1 (83 msec), there was no visual bias on perceived location of the sound, while the bias was present at a duration below this threshold (16 msec). Together, these results add to the mounting evidence suggesting that amplitude envelope has profound and varied effects on our perception of sounds, and is an important property to consider when designing experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicMultisensory perception and integrationFrench-language works237,207