MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024198883

Remediation of Heavy Metals with Poplar Trees

2023· dissertation· en· W7024198883 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStormwaterEnvironmental remediationWastewaterEffluentHeavy metalsSewage treatmentPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increase in population and car fleets has led to a sharp rise in the generation of carwash wastewater (CWW). CWW contains heavy metals, detergents, oil and grease, and suspended solids, and is considered one of the most polluting industries in terms of water consumption and wastewater production. In various parts of the world CWW is not treated but left to drain and impair receiving waters. Numerous jurisdictions are examining how simple green infrastructure like low impact development (LID) technologies, such as rain gardens that treat polluted urban stormwater may be used to help treat the pollutant loads in CWW. Given that many of these green technologies use trees, this thesis examines how poplar trees are impacted by and remediate heavy metals that exist in CWW. The study was conducted at the University of Victoria, BC, Canada, and involved both laboratory work and field work conducted from 2021 to 2022. The research focused on tree health and heavy metal uptake and evaluated the performance of the designed treatment field in removing contaminants from CWW. The proposed methodology is grounded in a low-impact development (LID) approach tailored for wastewater treatment, particularly suited to remote, rural, and underserved areas, including developing nations like India, Malaysia, and other countries in the Middle East. The results demonstrate a decreasing trend in the concentration of zinc, cadmium, nickel, iron, copper, and lead from the point of application (point 1) at the field site to the effluent point (point 4), indicating good performance for removing these heavy metals. The removal rates for zinc, nickel, lead, iron, copper, and cadmium were 78.4%, 61.9%, 82.4%, 86.4%, 78.1%, and 98.95% respectively. The study assessed the uptake of heavy metals by poplar trees by analyzing the concentrations in tree leaves. The data showed variations in heavy metal concentrations between different trees and leaf positions, with some metals exhibiting higher concentrations in the bottom leaves and others showing higher concentrations in the top leaves. The concentrations of heavy metals in the leaves were also influenced by seasonal variations and leaf turnover. Overall, the research findings indicate the impact to poplar trees in systems that use poplar trees for treating carwash wastewater, highlighting the importance of considering seasonal variations and leaf turnover when studying heavy metal uptake in trees. These findings carry significance for enhancing wastewater treatment procedures and encouraging responsible approaches across a range of industrial and environmental contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207