MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7024214940

Regulation of Diapause Entry and Termination in the Swede Midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)

2012· dissertation· en· W7024214940 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsDiapausephotoperiodismLarvaPEST analysisPupaInstar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is an investigation of several aspects of diapause in the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii (Kieffer). After developing methodology for induction and quantification of diapause entry in the laboratory, heritability of diapause entry was assessed for sibling larvae reared under diapause-inducing conditions. The diapause-quantification technique was efficient, but diapause frequencies were highly variable across studies employing similar diapause-inducing conditions. The diapause entry trait may be weakly heritable. A field study was conducted on diapause entry and emergence patterns. Diapause frequency was inversely correlated with photoperiod and absolute maximum air temperature. Photoperiod did not influence emergence timing. Two emergence phenotypes were observed before mid-July and a third minor emergence phenotype may exist in mid-to-late August. Approximately one third of emergence in the field was attributed to larvae in diapause for two or more years. Avenues of future research on diapause regulation in both the laboratory and field are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentalhigh
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designObservational · Bench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→