Receiving And Donating Blood: Between Solidarity, the Generation of Social Ties, and Objectification? the Paradoxes of Transfusion in a Pluricultural Clinical Context
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, I examine blood transfusion from the point of view of families of diverse social, national, and economic backgrounds who live in Montreal (Canada), whose children are being transfused.My objective is to explore the experience of receiving a transfusion and the opinions regarding the blood donation system.Based on a qualitative methodology centered on observations, semi-directed interviews, and thematic analysis, I discuss the participants' perspectives within the framework of critical medical anthropology, and the social and dehumanizing scope of organic tissue treatment systems.Drawing on my fieldwork, I conclude that these families perceive the blood collection system ambivalently.Families have different reactions regarding anonymity, blood restitution, and donor-recipient connections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it