Résurgence et espoir de renouveau. Apprivoiser la modernité théâtrale. La pièce en un acte de la Belle Époque à la Crise, Anthologie de textes dramatiques choisis et présentés par Lucie Robert, Nota Bene, 263 p. Écrits sur le théâtre canadien-français. Études suivies d’une anthologie (1900-1950), Sous la direction de Gilbert David, Département des littératures de langue française de l’Université de Montréal, « Paragraphes », 518 p. L’Éveil culturel. Théâtre et presse à Montréal, 1898-1914, de Hervé Guay, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, « Nouvelles études québécoises », 354 p. National Performance: Representing Quebec from Expo 67 to Céline Dion, de Erin Hurley, University of Toronto Press, « Cultural Spaces », 244 p. Le diable en ville. Alexandre Silvio et la naissance de la modernité populaire au Québec, de Germain Lacasse, Johanne Massé et Bethsabée Poirier, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 306 p. De l’acteur vedette au théâtre de festival. Histoire des pratiques scéniques montréalaises 1940-1980, de Sylvain Schryburt, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, « Socius », 395 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".