MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024331040

The role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in diaphragm dysfunction during sepsis /

2006· other· en· W7024331040 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2006
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProinflammatory cytokineDiaphragm (acoustics)MediatorChemokineSkeletal muscleSepsisInflammation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sepsis-induced diaphragmatic force loss and failure are associated with an increased exposure to proinflammatory mediators. The septic diaphragm has recently been reported to overexpresse chemokines, including the CC chemokine MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1). This thesis seeks to address the significance of MCP-1 overproduction in diaphragm proinflammatory mediator expression and skeletal muscle contractile function. Neutralization of endogenous MCP-1, produced following administration of LPS, decreased transcription of iNOS, IL-6, IL-1alpha, IL-1beta and MCP-1 in the diaphragm and prevented a decrease in diaphragm force production. Furthermore, exogenous MCP-1 stimulated IL-6 and MCP-1 transcription in primary diaphragm myotubes, and injection of MCP-1 in the healthy EDL muscle led to contractile weakness. Taken together, these results suggest that increased MCP-1 production in the septic diaphragm stimulates proinflammatory mediator production by diaphragm myocytes, contributing to the muscle's contractile dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207