MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024339798

Screening for intimate partner violence in the early postpartum period: pregnancy, maternal, and child outcomes from the prenatal period to five years post-delivery

2018· dissertation· en· W7024339798 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violenceLogistic regressionPostpartum periodPoison controlPrenatal carePregnancyPublic healthMental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Manitoba, government policy is for public health nurses to screen families with newborns within one week post-discharge for a number of risk factors associated with poor child developmental health, including a question on a past or current history of intimate partner violence (IPV) between parenting partners. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in the developmental trajectories of mothers and their children from the prenatal period to 5-years post-delivery based on the IPV screen response. Administrative databases housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy provided data for this study. Manitoban women giving birth to a live singleton infant from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2006 were included in analyses. Outcomes assessed included sociodemographic covariates, maternal prenatal morbidities and complications, birth outcomes, maternal postpartum health, child postpartum health, postpartum child welfare organization involvement, and children’s readiness for school at kindergarten entry. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to examine differences in outcomes of interest based on IPV screen response (i.e., negative IPV screen, positive IPV screen, not screened for IPV). In the study population, 66.7% of the sample was screened for a history (past or current) of IPV between parenting partners. Among women who were screened, 2.1% screened positive for IPV. Findings indicated that a positive IPV screen was associated with increased maternal prenatal morbidities (e.g., mental health problems, hospitalizations), as well as more adverse birth outcomes (e.g., low birthweight, preterm birth). In the 5 years post-delivery, a positive screen for IPV at birth was associated with poorer maternal and child health, increased child and families services contact, and children being less ready for school at kindergarten entry relative to those with a negative IPV screen. Similar patterns of adverse outcomes were noted among women (and their children) who were not screened for IPV (vs. women screening negative for IPV) in the early postpartum period. Incorporating IPV screening into routine prenatal care, rather than assessing IPV experiences after birth, may help to better identify families in need of support and, ultimately, improve pregnancy outcomes and the longer-term trajectory of women and their children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it