Relations Between the United States and Santo Domingo with Special Emphasis on President Grant's Treaty of Annexations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
rapacity, that the Indinns ro3e araiti.stthem and annihilated the entire colony.Santo Domingo lies in the litlantic Ocean at t,he entrance to the Gulf of :t\"exico.Next to Cuba in size of the Great Antilles group, its position and natural advantages place it first in rank or all the beautiful islands in these waters~ 1'he territorial ext,ent of the whole island is about four hundred Bn,slish miles; the extreme breadth of its widest part nearly one 3 hundred eighty miles.0 For exact location, Santo Domingo is in lB 20' Horth latitude, and in 6'3 40 1 West longitude.It is about seventy miles southwest o.f Cuba, one h.und.redthirty r:dles northeast oi' Jamaica, and sixt.ymiles west northwest of Puerto Hico.The peculiar i'orr.:iati.on of the island c;iv-es it.almost every variety of climut.e.Its Boils 6Lnd vetret.at.ion arc equally n.s varied.?roducts such c1s su~ar, cocoa, tobacco, maho;:any, cedar, satin-wood, gum, wax, and ho.ney, ~s well as copper, eold, and other metills, arc .fo.und in abund.:.ncc in Santo Domina;o.Hock salt is also a natural production, 5and salines are numerous.Under Spanish rule t.he Indians were reduced to slavery in the mines 4 and on haciendas.The i11hur11an Spmiish policy c<1used the death of thousands of the Indians.l.t'uropean diseases killed many also.Las Cases, the Apostle t.o the Indians persuaded the Spanish authorities to substitute negro slaves to take the place o.f the Indians.Thou.sands of Negroes were brought into 3~az"r'l on ci t
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".