MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024515667

Review of "Smelter Smoke in North America: The Politics of Transborder Pollution"

2000· review· en· W7024515667 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)GrassrootsCommissionResistance (ecology)Negotiation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If you live in the West Kootenay valley, then you've seen the Trail Metallurgical Operations Plant owned by Cominco.Cominco is a huge integrated smelter and refinery producing zinc, lead, silver, several other metals, and incongruously, fertilizer.You've heard the stories of a subterranean gold-filled vault, heavy water for the Manhattan Project and a dispute between Canada and the USA over air pollution.All of these are facts not fiction."Smelter Smoke in North America: The Politics of Transborder Pollution" by John D. Wirth, published in 2000, examines the story of Cominco's atmospheric emissions.Wirth is a history professor at Stanford and a White House appointee serving on the NAFTA Commission for Environmental Cooperation.His scholarly, thorough book leads through a maze where grassroots public action, corporate interests, government involvement, and science intertwine.These strands strain the balance between economic needs, protecting citizens' health and the cross-border issues between Canada and the USA.Wirth describes the evolution of accepting environmental protection as a legitimate, necessary cost of business.He provides examples of resistance to this perspective and some erratic progress towards sustainable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207