MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7024540961

Representations of Black Female Bodies in Contemporary Caribbean Art: A Model for Responding to Art

2024· other· en· W7024540961 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlack feminismIdentity (music)Black femalePaintingCriticismThe artsVisual arts educationArt criticismFeelingDiversity (politics)Studio
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing on critical race theory, intersectionality, and gender, I examine representations of Black female bodies in contemporary Caribbean art by examining three paintings by Barbadian artist Sheena Rose: (a) Black Beauty, (b) Anxiety, and (c) Mental Illness, Don’t Laugh!!! It Isn’t Funny!! Shouted the Angry Artist. I aim to encourage students and educators to consider their perceptions on issues such as race, gender, and mental health when viewing art by Black female artists. Due to the tension between observation in formal analysis and the focus on lived experiences and feelings in phenomenology, I created a Self-Reflective Model for Art Criticism Featuring a Pedagogy of Identity Exploration, resulting in a teaching unit for visual arts by Black female artists using Sheena Rose’s artwork. Due to the current and historical racialized, sexualized representations of Black Female bodies, my research is significant because of its relevance to art history, pedagogy, and studio art settings beyond Trinidad and Tobago and Canada. It also allows students to gain a deeper understanding and appreciation for diversity and cultural knowledge in high school classrooms and other art settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.023
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→Same topicIsotope Analysis in Ecology→French-language works237,207→