MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024572873

Short-Term and Long-Term Margins of International Trade: Evidence from the Canada-Chile Free Trade

2017· report· en· W7024572873 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCarleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · 2017
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersForeign Affairs and International Trade Canada
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DiafiltrationDysgeusiaLiquationProteogenomicsFusible alloyHemopericardium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the impact of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement (CCFTA) on
\nCanadian exports to Chile, particularly the dynamic effects of the agreement on extensive
\nand intensive margins of trade. Consistent with the literature, we find that the extensive
\nmargin effects occurred later than the intensive margin effects and became more prominent
\nin the long-term. Surprisingly, the intensive margin effects died off in the long-term. A
\ntheoretical model is constructed to show that our results can arise in a standard setting of
\nintra-industry trade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University)French-language works237,207