MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7024575811

Slave Refugees, Self-Emancipation, and the Evolving Landscape of Freedom in the United States and Canada

2020· article· en· W7024575811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLeiden Repository (Leiden University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)Perspective (graphical)LegislationWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leidschrift, jaargang 35, nummer 3, november 2020 separation, brutal treatment, and a lifelong yearning to be free were the primary motivations behind self-emancipation. Slave Refugees, Wartime Migrations, and the First Emancipation in the United States and CanadaDuring the colonial era, black enslavement existed in various forms across North America.European colonisers forcibly migrated enslaved Africans via the transatlantic slave trade to the present-day United States and Canada.Over subsequent decades, through a combination of forced migration and natural reproduction, the enslaved black population of North America grew to the hundreds of thousands, primarily confined to the southern states.3 Yet contrary to popular imagination, slavery was not confined to the southern colonies.Enslaved Africans and African-descended people were held across New England and the northern Mid-Atlantic (New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania).Statutes and judicial rulings across these regions upheld the legality of black enslavement.4 Meanwhile, black enslavement was legal and practiced throughout French and British Canada.Enslaved Africans and African-descended people were held in the Canadian Maritimes, Lower Canada (present-day Quebec), and Upper Canada (present-day southwestern Ontario).In her book The Hanging of Angélique, Afua Cooper referred to black enslavement as 'Canada's 3 The origins and development of US slavery have been covered by numerous scholarly studies.For sample introductory texts, see P. Kolchin, American Slavery, 1619-1877 (New York, NY 1993); I. Belin, Many Thousands Gone: The First Two Centuries of Slavery in North America (Cambridge, MA 1998); I. Berlin, Generations of Captivity: A History of African American Slaves (Cambridge, MA 2003); D. Brion Davis, Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of Slavery in the New World (New York, NY 2006), Ch. 6. 4 For slavery in New England, see W. Warren, New England Bound: Slavery and Colonization in Early America (New York, NY 2016); For slavery in the northern Mid-Atlantic, see E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0320.018
Scholarly communication0.0110.002
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLeiden Repository (Leiden University)→Same topicColonialism, slavery, and trade→French-language works237,207→