Sensory Integration Therapy in A Mentally RetardedPatient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To increase performance participation in activities with sensory integration therapy on developing adaptive reactions in a mentally retarded person. Material and methods: Modulation and praxia problems of a 20-year-old female patient were evaluated using Dunn sensory profile and clinical observation of neuro-motor performance. Self care, productivity and leisure activities were evaluated with Canada Activity Performance Measurement (COPM). After the evaluation, physiotherapy program and sensory integration approach were applied for problem areas, for 6 months, 2 days a week for 45 minutes. Deep pressure, proprioception and vestibular input activities were used for modulation problems. For bilateral activities, praxia and ball activities including somato-sensory were used and activities containing sequential movements were used for movement sequencing. The patient and her family were given sensory diet home program. Results: Sensory modulation problems were identified in proprioceptive, tactile and vestibular systems. Tactile defensiveness, postural deformities, bilateral integration was identified in clinical observation of neuro-motor performance. Problems in somatodyspraxia were identified with sequencing evaluation. Somatodyspraxia evaluation showed that body could not make total flexion; had sequential finger touching and diadochokinesia problems. Modulation problems like frequent falling and distraction were present before the therapy; frequency of falls decreased and concentration time lengthened after the therapy. Somatodyspraxia problems were decreased. While at the beginning of the therapy COPM score was 5.3, at the end of the therapy it improved and scored 7.3. Conclusion: It was found that sensory integration therapy decreased modulation and praxis problems in mentally retarded people and contributed to forming adaptive reactions required in daily life. To promote social and emotional responses and social participation of these people, treatment program should include sensory integration therapy and further studies should be conducted on larger sampling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".