THE STUDY OF COSSACKS IN THE INTELLECTUAL STUDIES OF THE UKRAINIAN DIASPORA IN AUSTRALIA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to investigate how Ukrainians in Australia perceived the Cossacks and popularized knowledge about the Cossacks. The tasks of the article are to write about those persons who mentioned the Cossacks, what they wanted, the circumstances and directions of their activities. The sources for writing the article are materials from the periodical press of the Ukrainian Australian diaspora, some archival materials, works of representatives of the Ukrainian diaspora, articles about their activities in the memoir direction (memoirs, obituaries). In historiography, there is no statement of the question that is the topic of consideration of our article. However, individual comments are contained in personal articles about some of the heroes of our article. It is also worth noting as a historiographical base the articles devoted to the general development of Ukrainian studies (Ukrainian studies) in Australia It was concluded that against the background of the work of Ukrainian humanitarians, poets, writers. artists of Canada, the USA, and Western Europe, Cossack studies in Australia developed at a catch-up pace, which was due to the relative youth of the diaspora on the fifth continent. Most of the mentioned characters developed their previous work in Australia (first of all, we are talking about Ivan Rybchyn). Some of the scientists who had the potential for relevant studies (S. Narizhnyi, E. Zavalynskyi) did not show activity for various reasons. However, the very presence of a trace of Cossack studies in the activities of the Australian intelligentsia eloquently testifies to the potential of the Cossack idea for the consolidation of Ukrainians. The most original work among Australian scientists belongs to O. Zybachynskyi, who managed to include the Cossacks in a broad historiosophical context. The merit of I. Rybchyn was the analysis of the phenomenon of Cossacks in a psychological context. He also subjected the phenomenon of Cossacks to a more objective and at the same time neoconservative analysis. But in the discourse of the Australian diaspora, as well as other diasporas, a neo-populist and neo-romantic view of the Cossacks prevailed. Undoubtedly, the numerous remarks of Australian Ukrainians about the nation-building activities of the Cossacks and their struggle against Russian imperialism are relevant in the conditions of the current Russian threat. In general, Australian Cossack studies have demonstrated an original synthesis of interdisciplinarity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".