MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7024789108

STUDIES TO IMPROVE THE IN VIVO MEASUREMENT OF STRONTIUM BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE

2024· dissertation· en· W7024789108 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStrontiumIn vivoBackscatter (email)FluorescenceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strontium is a rare earth element, present in products such as pyrotechnics, medications, glass and certain pigments. Exposure of humans to strontium mainly comes through dietary means, through the consumption of food and water. While high levels of strontium have been shown to be toxic in animal studies, low levels may be beneficial, such as for the treatment of osteoporosis. Some women in Canada choose to self-supplement with strontium with the intention of preventing this bone disease. At present, there is no clinical tool to monitor strontium levels in these women. A technology that could montior women would be useful as it would allow the determination of whether the self-supplementation is indeed beneficial. To measure strontium in humans, a non-invasive, non-destructive technique called X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is used. This thesis describes work to develop improved technology for in vivo measurements of strontium in bone using XRF. A new XRF system for measuring strontium in bone was designed around a VITUS H150 Silicon Drift Detector (SDD) from KETEK GmbH, and used a 109Cd source in a 180º backscatter geometry. The system was calibrated against a series of anthropomorphic finger phantoms which were 3D printed with a strontium doped hydroxyapatite core and varying polylactic acid (PLA) thicknesses to simulate different thicknesses of soft tissue. Phantoms with a range range of strontium concentrations were created to test the system. It was determined that the new system was able to perform as well as previously tested radioisotope-based in vivo strontium XRF systems, with the system having the potential to perform significantly better if a significantly more active source could be employed. Calibration using the 3D printed phantoms was also found to perform extremely well, indicating that this phantom methodology is a viable way to make more anatomically correct calibration phantoms in the future. A Monte Carlo model was created in the EGS 5 code of the experimental geometry and the model performance was benchmarked against experimental data. This model was then used to test two separate issues. First, the model was used to determine the validity of coherent normalization for in vivo strontium measurements in the finger. Second, the model was used to determine if there was a radioisotope source that could result in better performance of the system. The coherent normalization was shown to not be valid in terms of correction for soft tissue attenuation, but may be valid as a correction method for errors in positioning or patient motion. In combination with a new Compton correlation method that can estimate the thickness of overlying soft tissue, the implementation of coherent normalization would reduce variability in the system’s measurements of the strontium signal. Finally, through the testing of alternative radioisotope sources, 103Pd was identified as a promising alternative source of fluorescing photons and it is recommended that an experimental XRF system employing this source be tested to verify this result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→