Timar Rûznâmçe Defterlerine Göre Saruhan Sancağı Timarlı Sipahileri (1595-1617)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this thesis; with the help of identities and qualifications of the Timarli Sipahis, the Timarli Sipahis of Saruhan Sandjak’s and their social and military functions within the Ottoman empire have examined. The Saruhan Sandjak was one of the important sandjaks of the Ottoman empire and named as “Şehzadeler Sancağı / The Sandjak of the Şehzades”. The time we cover in our thesis is from 1595 to 1617, the reigns of Mehmed the Third and Ahmed the First. Because of the times of crisis, the Timar system had been begun to revise, and the emergence of Jelali Revolts had a negative influence upon the Sipahis in terms of political, socio-economic, military and social sides. While we examine the Timarli Sipahis we also would try to cover the course of events and their influence on the Saruhan Sandjak. Furthermore, the historical geography of Manisa at this time, implementation of Timar system in that region and the development of state-timar holder-peasant relations would be tried to clarify. In this study, a Timarli Sipahi profile had been tried to draw with the help of the rûznâmçe defters as our main source, also from the other sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".