MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024811024

Timar Rûznâmçe Defterlerine Göre Saruhan Sancağı Timarlı Sipahileri (1595-1617)

2018· dissertation· en· W7024811024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOttoman Empire History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOttoman empireEmpirePeriod (music)Cover (algebra)IslamQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis; with the help of identities and qualifications of the Timarli Sipahis, the Timarli Sipahis of Saruhan Sandjak’s and their social and military functions within the Ottoman empire have examined. The Saruhan Sandjak was one of the important sandjaks of the Ottoman empire and named as “Şehzadeler Sancağı / The Sandjak of the Şehzades”. The time we cover in our thesis is from 1595 to 1617, the reigns of Mehmed the Third and Ahmed the First. Because of the times of crisis, the Timar system had been begun to revise, and the emergence of Jelali Revolts had a negative influence upon the Sipahis in terms of political, socio-economic, military and social sides. While we examine the Timarli Sipahis we also would try to cover the course of events and their influence on the Saruhan Sandjak. Furthermore, the historical geography of Manisa at this time, implementation of Timar system in that region and the development of state-timar holder-peasant relations would be tried to clarify. In this study, a Timarli Sipahi profile had been tried to draw with the help of the rûznâmçe defters as our main source, also from the other sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it