MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024812581

Sprinkler testing at Kemano

2002· article· en· W7024812581 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringTraining (meteorology)Fire safetyFire protectionFirefightingMains electricityFire brigade
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kemano Village in northern British Columbia was a company town owned by Alcan Smelters and Chemicals Ltd. This remote village had recently been closed as a result of restructuring power operations. Alcan donated more than 60 houses in the village to the provincial government's fire services for the purposes of training firefighters and fire investigators and conducting fire studies. The project was known as the Kemano Public Safety Initiative (KPSI). KPSI provided a unique opportunity to conduct fire experiments in residential dwellings. At Kemano, the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and an industry partnercompleted a series of fire experiments in a residential dwelling to better understand performance issues relating to cross-linked-polyethylene (PEX-a) pipe sprinkler systems. This was done using fire scenarios typical to those found in residential fires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207