MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024817146

Subakromial s?k??ma sendromu olan hastalarda terapotik ultrason tedavisinin etkinli?i ?zerine yap?lan randomize kontroll? bir ?al??ma

2015· dissertation· tr· W7024817146 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace Repository · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubacromial impingementQuality of life (healthcare)Range of motionFrozen shoulderRotator cuff
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ama?: Subakromial s?k??ma sendromlu hastalarda terapotik ultrason tedavisinin eklem hareket a??kl???, a?r?, fonksiyonel testler ve ya?am kalitesi ?zerine etkinli?inin de?erlendirilmesi ama?land?.Materyal Metod: Subakromial s?k??ma sendromu tan?s? alan 62 hasta ?al??maya al?nd?. Hastalar randomize edilerek iki gruba ayr?ld?. Bir gruba standart egzersiz program? ve terapotik ultrason (n=31) ve di?er gruba standart egzersiz program? ve plasebo ultrason (n=31) verildi. Hastalar 12 hafta boyunca izlendi. Hastalar?n omuz eklem hareket a??kl??? (EHA) goniometre ile, istirahat, gece ve hareketle olu?an omuz a?r?s? 0-10 cm'lik vis?el analog skala (VAS) ile, fonksiyonel durum Western Ontario Rotator Kaf ?ndeksi (WORC), The Society of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation (ASESS) ve Constant skorlamas? (CS) ile, ya?am kalitesi short-form 36 (SF-36) ile de?erlendirildi. Bu de?erlendirmeler tedavi ?ncesi, tedavi sonras? 3. ve 12. haftalarda yap?ld?.Bulgular: Tedavi ?ncesinde her iki grup aras?nda ya?, cinsiyet, meslek, e?itim d?zeyi, semptom s?resi, travma ?yk?s?, omuz magnetik rezonans g?r?nt?leme (MRG) evresi a??s?ndan anlaml? fark yoktu ( p>0.05). Tedavi sonras?nda da her iki grupta yap?lan egzersiz say?s? ve antienflamatuar ila? kullan?m? a??s?ndan da anlaml? bir fark saptanmad? ( p>0.05). Her iki grupta da tedavi ile EHA de?erlerinde anlaml? bir iyile?me g?r?ld? (p 0.05).Sonu?: Subakromial s?k??ma sendromu tan?s? alan hastalarda konvansiyonel egzersize devaml? modda terapotik ultrason eklenmesinin a?r? azalmas?na, fonksiyonellik art???na katk? sa?lad??? bulundu. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound therapy on the range of motion, pain, functional tests and quality of life in the patients suffering from the subacromial impingement syndrome .Material-Method: 62 patients with the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome were involved in the study. The patients were classified into two groups randomly. One group (n=31) was given standard exercise program and therapeutic ultrasound and the other group (n=31) was given standart exercise program and sham ultrasound. Then the patients were followed up for 12 weeks. The shoulder range of motion (ROM) of the patients was assessed with goniometer; the shoulder pain at rest, during motion, night pain were evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0-10 cm; and the functional status with Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), The Society of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation (ASESS) and Constant scoring (CS) These evaluations were done before the treatment and after the treatment on the 3th and 12th weeks.Findings: Before treatment, there was no significant difference between the groups in age, sex, occupation, education level, symptom duration, trauma history, shoulder magnetic resonance imaging phase (p>0.05). After treatment, there was no significant difference between the groups in the number of exercise done and antienflamatuar drug use (p>0.05). Significant recovery was determined in shoulder ROM measurements due to treatment in both groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in ROM values after treatment. VAS scores showed significant improvement in both groups. ?mprovement at 12th week was significantly better in ultrasound group than control group in night pain and motion pain scores. ASESS scores were significantly improved in ultrasound group, hovewer improvement in control group was not significant. There was no significant difference between groups in CS before treatment, however CS in ultrasound group at 12th week was significantly better than control group. WORC scores showed significant improved in both groups. Although the difference was not significant, improvement in WORC score in ultrasound group was better than control group. Six of eight SF-36 parameters were significantly improved in ultrasound group, hovewer three of eight SF-36 parameters were significantly improved in control group at 12 weeks. There was no significant difference between groups in SF-36 parameters after treatment.Conclusion: It was found that the therapeutic ultrasound applied together with the conventional exercise program for the subacromial impingement syndrome patients reduces pain and increases the functionality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it