MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024824720

Sistema de gest??o da qualidade para Centros de Coleta\ne Processamento de S??men bovino: elabora????o, implanta????o e impacto

2014· dissertation· pt· W7024824720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)Manufacturing processProcess (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apesar de o Brasil ter comercializado mais de 12 milh??es de doses de s??men bovino no ano de 2012, ainda n??o existe um padr??o de processamento das doses comercializadas pelos estabelecimentos cadastrados pelo Minist??rio da Agricultura,\nPecu??ria e Abastecimento. A hip??tese do presente trabalho ?? de que a elabora????o e a implanta????o de um sistema de An??lise de Perigos e Pontos Cr??ticos de Controle (APPCC) para um centro de coleta e processamento de s??men bovino seja capaz de identificar as etapas potencialmente danosas para a viabilidade das doses, diminuir a sua rejei????o e melhorar a sua qualidade final, a partir da ado????o de medidas preventivas e de controle do processo. A implanta????o do sistema APPCC identificou as etapas que apresentavam perigos para a qualidade das doses de s??men produzidas, ocorrendo redu????o na contamina????o durante o seu processamento (P<0,05), Tamb??m houve um incremento na motilidade progressiva e na integridade das membranas plasm??tica e acrossomal dos espermatoz??ides (P<0,05) ap??s a implanta????o do sistema APPCC, bem como uma redu????o na rejei????o de partidas e\ndoses de s??men (P<0,05), o que se refletiu em uma diminui????o dos custos de produ????o. Assim, a utiliza????o do sistema APPCC resultou na padroniza????o do processo de produ????o de s??men bovino congelado, com incremento da qualidade seminal, redu????o na rejei????o de doses e nos custos para a ind??stria.\nAdicionalmente, durante o programa de doutorado sandu??che na Universidade de Calgary (Canad??),foi avaliado o envolvimento da enzima conversora da angiotensina\nno processo de capacita????o esperm??tica e fertiliza????o in vitro em bovinos. Ap??s o bloqueio da atividade da enzima com o inibidor espec??fico captopril,observou-se n??veis semelhantes de fosforila????o da prote??na tirosina e de clivagem e\ndesenvolvimento embrion??rio at?? o est??gio de blastocisto, em compara????o com o controle (P>0,05). Portanto, o presente estudo sugere que a enzima conversora da angiotensina n??o ?? necess??ria para o processo de capacita????o esperm??tica nem\nest?? envolvida na fertiliza????o in vitro, em bovinos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Same topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207