MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7024882789

Temperature Changes in First Year Arctic Sea Ice During the Decay Process.

2002· article· en· W7024882789 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsSea iceArctic ice packSea ice thicknessAntarctic sea iceCryosphereDrift iceSea ice growth processesIce-albedo feedbackSea ice concentration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of the seasonal deterioration of landfast, first year sea ice were made in McDougall Sound, Eastern Canadian Arctic, from early May to July 2002. Ice temperatures were obtained from a temperature chain that was frozen into the ice. The uppermost 0.40 m of ice responded to short-term fluctuations in air temperature. Ice below a depth of 0.50 m showed longer-term response to the steady increase in air temperature. During the decay process, the winter profile of increasing ice temperature with increasing depth reversed; the upper ice surface was warmer than the bottom ice. A systematic increase in ice temperature was observed in ice at all depths. Warming rates decreased linearly from top to bottom, from 0.26°C/day to 0.03°C/day respectively. An analysis showed that the rate of ice decay could be approximated knowing the air temperature/ice surface temperature, ice thickness, and its depth-dependent warming rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207