Statement of the principal circumstances connected with the establishment of the line of ocean steamers between Liverpool and Canada, and the service performed from May, 1853, to December, 1854.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ter of 1853, or their fortnightly service until the opening of the St. Lawrence in the present year.Apologizing for the length of these prefatory explanations, I proceed to state, that the Government of Canada were -rnxious for a commencement of the steam service to test the capabilities Commence-of the route via the St. Lawrence toEngland; and the Contractors, ment of apro-(jpgjroug ofmeetingthe'w views, alt hough the contract had only heen Vie*.two months in thnr hands, commenced a steam service early in 1853, which will be afterwards referred to at more length.Soon after the completion of the Contract, the Contractors proceeded to mature arrangements for the association of the Formation of P art i es interested with them into a Company for the pur- Company, poses of the Contract, in which, however, they experien- ced difficulties of a character which could not have been anticipated in consequence of the unprecedented refusal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".