MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7024923925

Stratégies pour contribuer au rehaussement du niveau de compétences en littératie des étudiantes et des étudiants au collégial: technique d'éducation à l'enfance

2020· other· fr· W7024923925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · 2020
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)MallinckrodtSet (abstract data type)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage a été réalisé à l’initiative du Collège Lionel-Groulx, plus spécifiquement par Michel Simard, directeur du Centre de recherche et d’expertise en multilittératie des adultes (CREMA). Ce projet a été mené en collaboration avec Nancy Granger, professeure à la faculté d’éducation de l’Université de Sherbrooke et responsable de l’Équipe de recherche en littératie et inclusion (ÉRLI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→