A Study on Good Governance and Socıal Welfare for Turkey Relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last quarter of the 20th century is a time when public administrationreforms have been implemented to make public administration more efficient and productive.In thesame period, the concept of good governance / governance, which was used for the first time by theWorld Bank as a new approach in the field of management, emerged. The good governance /governance quality that an individual country possesses affects the management of the state andpublic institutions positively as well as positively affects the economic sphere. In this study,developed by the World Bank "governance indicators" with the relationship between social welfare,the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) 's based on the Social Development Index andHuman Development Index Turkey and the other five developing countries (China, India, Mexico,Brazil, Greece and Russia) will be analyzed and analyzed. On the one hand, the New InstitutionalEconomics approach will be exploited from public administration theory on the other hand. Theresult of the study is that in general the creation and maintenance of Governance principles hasincreased social welfare both in economic and development terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".