Técnica grafo plástica y desarrollo de la escritura en escolares de 5 años del nivel inicial N° 314 Boca Colorado, Madre de Dios-2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El fin esencial de esta indagación es explicar la reciprocidad con la técnica grafo plástica y el desarrollo de la escritura en escolares de 5 años del nivel inicial No 314 Boca Colorado, Madre de Dios-2021. \nInvestigación elemental cuantitativo, de correspondencia y no experimental el equipo poblacional estuvo conformado por 21 infantes y se trabajó en un grupo muestral de 20 escolares, de 5 años de educación inicial No 314 Boca Colorado, Madre de Dios. Se utilizó dos fichas para observar en ambos casos contenían 15 ítems, de los datos consolidados de la encuesta se procesó y las correspondencias visualizadas para la HG en el que r=-,224; p=0,330 > 0,05; del que se desprende. La técnica grafo plástica no tiene correspondencia lineal y es negativa baja con el desarrollo de la escritura en escolares de 5 años del nivel inicial No 314 Boca Colorado, Madre de Dios-2021.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".