MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025057992

Thermodynamic and structural anomalies of water
\nnanodroplets from computer simulations

2018· dissertation· en· W7025057992 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
KeywordsSupercoolingLaplace pressureTensor (intrinsic definition)IsotropyNucleationMolecular dynamicsLiquid waterAutocorrelationHydrostatic pressure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid water nanodroplets are valuable for studying supercooled water because they \nresist nucleation well below the bulk freezing temperature and conveniently selfpressurize \nin the interior. These features make nanodroplets good candidates for \nstudying the properties of liquid water and for probing the liquid-liquid critical point \n(LLCP) in water hypothesized to exist in the deeply supercooled state at high pressure, \nat which a distinct low density liquid (LDL) phase becomes distinct from a high \ndensity liquid (HDL) phase. \nWe conduct extensive molecular dynamics computer simulations to study the \nproperties of water nanodroplets using the TIP4P/2005 potential over a wide range \nof size and temperature. In order to improve the sampling of independent microstates, \nwe conduct “swarms” of independent simulations, in which we monitor the approach \nto equilibrium from the potential energy autocorrelation function. After a swarm \nof this size attains equilibrium, the ensemble of final microstates from each run is \nsufficient to evaluate equilibrium properties and their uncertainties in the shortest \nreal time. \nIn order to study the possibility of recovering bulk properties using nanodroplets, \nwe evaluate the Laplace pressure inside the nanodroplets from direct evaluation of \nthe local pressure tensor. We use a modification of a coarse-graining pressure tensor \nmethod that calculates the components of the microscopic pressure tensor as a function of radial distance r from the centre of a spherical water droplet. The pressure \ntensor beneath the surface region becomes approximately isotropic and constant \nwith r. From this region where the components of the pressure tensor are equal, we \ndetermine the Laplace pressure of the droplets. \nDefining the pressure and the density inside the nanodroplets enables us to probe \nthe properties of liquid water nanodroplet cores. We find that the bulk properties \nand related anomalies are present in the nanodroplets, such as the appearance of a \ndensity maximum. We simulate water nanodroplets under extremly low temperature \nconditions that have not been investigated thoroughly before. At such low temperatures, \nthe nanodroplets show interesting emergence of structural complexity in the \ninterior which may be linked to the LLCP and may indicate a HDL-like to LDL-like \ntransformation in the nanodroplets. \nWe also study the surface tension of water nanodroplets using different approaches. \nWhen employing the thermodynamic route to calculating surface tension, we find that \nthe Tolman correction is small and can be neglected. Therefore, the surface tension \nof nanodroplets can be approximated by the planar surface tension. We also observe \na sudden increase in the planar surface tension at low temperature on crossing the \nWidom line, which may signal the emergence of a LDL-like network in the interior of \nwater nanodroplets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207