Una escudilla con decoración figurativa procedente de la Judería de Teruel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the newly discovered archaeological site in the square of the Jewish quarter of Teruel, stands a ceramic tile, a bowl of local development dated between the late thirteenth and early fourteenth. Its uniqueness comes from its decor, which depicted what we consider two Jewish characters with clear parallels in Jewish and Christian Hispanic iconography of the time. This is a finding of great interest, since it is a fairly rare event within the iconographic corpus and medieval ceramic repertoire. In any case, it is a magnificent example of the strength of the Jews of Teruel during the Late Middle Ages. Dentro del conjunto material hallado recientemente bajo la plaza de la Judería de Teruel, sobresale una pieza cerámica, una escudilla de elaboración local fechada entre finales del siglo XIII e inicios del XIV. Su singularidad procede de su decoración, en la que se representa a dos personajes que creemos judíos, con paralelos claros en las iconografías judaica y cristiana hispanas de la época. Se trata de un hallazgo de enorme interés, por su carácter único dentro del corpus iconográfico y repertorio cerámico medievales. En todo caso, constituye un magnífico exponente de la pujanza de la aljama turolense durante la Baja Edad Media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".