MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025088146

Türkiye MEB ve Ontario (Kanada) Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Öğretim Programlarının Karşılaştırılarak Değerlendirilmesi

2015· article· tr· W7025088146 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace-Sinop (Sinop University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DiafiltrationDysgeusiaLiquationDemotionFusible alloyTriacetin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bu çalışmada Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı 2004 Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi
\nÖğretim Programı ile Kanada’nın Ontario Eyaleti 1998 yılı Fen ve
\nTeknoloji Dersi Öğretim Programı, temel alınan yaklaşım, içerik, amaç,
\nöğrenme-öğretme süreci ve ölçme ve değerlendirme yaklaşımları
\nbakımından karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmada nitel
\nyöntem kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; programların kapsadıkları
\nsınıf seviyeleri, öğrenme alanları, öğrenme alanları ve ünitelerin
\nsınıflara dağılımı, program amaçları, programda yer alan kazanım
\nsayıları ve kazanımların derecelendirilmesi bakımından farklılıklar
\nbulunmuştur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it