MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025121070

8-th Offshore Mediterranean Conference (OMC)
\nRavenna, 28-30 March 2007

2007· other· en· W7025121070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Upstream (networking)FrontierProduction (economics)Economic shortageFossil fuelPetroleumQuality (philosophy)Task (project management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technical challenges in the Petroleum Upstream Sector are growing and becoming more and more difficult to face. The continuous increase of fossil fuel demand means producing more and being able to replace production with new reserves at the same speed. The task is not easy, especially if we consider the present situation: the lack of easy targets for exploration, the decreasing quality of discovered hydrocarbons, the shortage of skilled human resources, the more stringent environmental rules, the need to contain CO2 emissions, the growing prices of raw materials, ... just to mention some of the issues we have to face. \n \nThe only key to overcome all these issues is technology. Given the extent of the challenge, in order to be effective our efforts must focus on priorities. \n \nFirst of all sustainability, because in all its aspects it is a major concern for the future of the Oil and Gas Industry and therefore all papers dealing with related topics have been particularly appreciated. GHG and CO2 management, whose impact on all the different activities is growing fast, is a subject extensively discussed during OMC 2007 and is still a topic to devote time to in 2009. \n \nIt is quite obvious to stress reserves replacement as a fundamental issue for all Oil Companies but much less obvious is how to solve the problem: fresh ideas about new frontier exploration and how to increase recovery factor will be very positively evaluated. In the context of reserves replacement particular emphasis has been given to all types of unconventional resources including not only heavy oils, tight gas, coal bed methane but also highly sour gas and deep gas. All aspects related to economic and effective exploitation of these resources have been considered particularly worthy of attention. Methane hydrates, among unconventional resources, are playing an emerging role but a lot of technical work is still to be done, therefore contributions on this topic have been most welcome. \n \nIt is evident how important gas is in reserves replacement, but sometimes factors such as its location far from the markets, or its occurrence in small quantities associated to oil, could be a hurdle for economic exploitation; as a consequence of these considerations papers dealing with different aspects of the gas value chain heve been appreciated and carefully considered for the final program. \n \nOMC 2007 Conference and Exhibition was an unprecedented success thanks to the quality of papers presented and top level Exhibitors from worldwide. The event has recorded an important increase both in attendance and exhibition area. OMC 2007 figures reveal clearly that OMC 2007 was the best ever since the first one which dates back to 1993. OMC grows each time and it is now the main international meeting of the petroleum & gas industry in the Mediterranean area, targeting mainly the Northern and Southern shores of the Mediterranean Sea. \n \nAt OMC 2007 attended: \n \n14 Official Delegations (Algeria, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Egypt, Ecuador, Kazakhstan, India, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Romania, Turkey, Russia, Tunisia); \n \n932 Delegates from 35 Nations (Albania, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Congo, Croatia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Ecuador, France, Germany, Greece, India, United Kingdom, Iraq, Libya, Luxembourg, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sudan, Switzerland, The Netherlands, Tunisia, Turkey, Hungary, USA). \n \n111 Papers were presented in 21 Technical Sessions \n \n \nhttp://www.omc.it/2009/index.php?id=267

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2310.125

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)French-language works237,207