Understanding perceptions of social relationships with children among pedohebephilic individuals : a two-part study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current thesis comprises two studies examining social relationships with children among pedohebephilic individuals.Study one quantitatively examined mediators (i.e., internalized stigma, loneliness, sexual fantasies) of the association between social relationships with children, suicide, and a history sexual offending.Study two qualitatively explored reasons pedohebephilic individuals seek social relationships with children, and how these social relationships are conceptualized.Study one results did not demonstrate either partial or full mediation.Despite this, the length of social relationships with children was associated with a history of sexual offending.Results from qualitative study two noted four themes that highlighted concerns of dynamic changes, emotional congruence with children, challenges and risk of relationships with children, and the role of social networks.Findings suggest emotional congruence with children, social isolation from adults, and one's social network are likely to be contributing factors for pedohebephilic individuals developing social connections with children.August 28 th , 2023 To my supervisor, Dr. Skye Stephens, thank you for the time and effort you put into me and my growth as a researcher and aspiring clinician.Over the past two years you have given me the guidance, support, and confidence needed to start
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".