Un modelo de implantación territorial y municipal en la Baeturia Celtica : Arucci/Turobriga, civitas et territorium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objeto de estudio de esta tesis se ha centrado en la implantación de Roma en el norte del territorio onubense, en la zona meridional de la denominada Baeturia Celtica. La ciudad de Arucci/Turobriga fue fundada en época de Augusto madiante la fusión (contributio) de los núcleos prerromanos de Arucci y Turobriga. Ésta experimentará un gran desarrollo en época Julio-Claudia, cuando se construye el foro entre el principado de Calígula y el de Claudio. Esta actividad constructiva se prolongará hasta el reinado de la dinastía Flavia, momento en que se construyen las termas. El s. II d. C., especialmente bajo Trajano y Adriano, será el momento de máximo esplendor de la ciudad. Iniciado el s. III d. C. la ciudad mantendrá cierta actividad hasta que a mediados de siglo se comience abandonar, sirviendo de cantera para la construcción de nuevas villas rústicas y la ampliación de otras existentes.__________________________________________________The object of study of this thesis has centred on the implantation of Rome on the north of the Huelva territory, on the southern zone of Baeturia Celtica called. Arucci/Turobriga’s city was founded in epoch of Augusto by means of one the merger contributio of the preromans nucleuses of Arucci and Turobriga. The city will experience a great development in epoch In July-Claudio, when the forum is constructed between Caligula’s principality and that of Claudio. This constructive activity there will extend up to the reign of the dynasty Flavia, moment in which the thermal baths are constructed. S. the IInd A.D., specially under Trajano and Adriano, it will be the moment of maximum brilliance of the city. Initiated s. The IIIrd A.D. the city will support certain activity until in the middle of century it’s begun to leave, using as quarry for the construction of new rustic villas and the extension as existing others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".