MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025377208

Use of Siliceous and Calcareous Microalgae to Decarbonize Cement Production

2022· dissertation· en· W7025377208 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcareousDiatomCementBiomass (ecology)CementitiousFossil fuelFly ashFlue gas
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Production of ordinary portland cement (OPC) accounts for 7% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, mainly due to calcination of limestone and burning of fossil fuels for pyro-processing. Contrastingly, microalgae naturally uptake and sequester CO2 through photosynthesis at a ratio of ~1.8 kg CO2/kg dried microalgal biomass. Researchers have already successfully demonstrated synergy between cement decarbonization efforts and microalgae cultivation through conversion of CO2-rich flue gas to microalgal biomass. Biomass is then valorized into high-value co-products, and in at least one case it is returned to the plant for use as an alternative fuel for clinkering (St. Marys Cement, Canada). Another potential synergy between cement decarbonization efforts and microalgae involves the exploitation of biomineralizers, most notably siliceous diatoms and calcareous coccolithophores. In the current work, the chemical reactivity of freshly cultured diatom frustules as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) was explored (Chapters 4-6) for the first time. The chemical reactivity of Thalassiosira pseudonana frustules was relatively high (i.e., greater than a blast furnace slag, but lower than metakaolin). However, Phaeodactylum tricornutum frustules exhibited a lower chemical reactivity similar to a Class F fly ash. Overall, these data demonstrated not only the potential to grow highly reactive biominerals using diatoms but also the variability and potential tunability of diatom biosilica. With the goal of estimating the theoretical reduction in embodied carbon emissions of concrete mixtures incorporating microalgal biominerals as raw materials and/or SCMs, a life cycle assessment was also performed (Chapter 7). Replacement of OPC by diatom biosilica (i.e., DB) at 5 wt% resulted in a 4.8% reduction in the upfront embodied carbon emissions of a 45 MPa concrete, and the upfront embodied carbon emissions were reduced significantly further when coccolithophore calcite was incorporated due to its nature as a net-CO2 storing mineral. Specifically, the upfront embodied carbon emissions of a 45 MPa concrete were reduced by 62.8% when all the limestone in the cement raw meal was replaced with coccolithophore calcite. Taken together, the results of this dissertation work suggested that tremendous potential exists for biomineralizing microalgae, particularly siliceous diatoms and calcifying coccolithophores, to contribute to novel low-CO2 cement biotechnologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207