MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025379716

Webinar: Normas APA y Vancouver: conoce y aplica ambos estilos de citación en tus trabajos académicos

2021· article· es· W7025379716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Académico UPC (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyle (visual arts)Point (geometry)ClothingWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Dirección de Gestión del Conocimiento organizó el Webinar: "Normas APA y Vancouver: conoce y aplica ambos estilos de citación en tus trabajos académicos ", que tuvo como ponente a Rosa Linda Grados – Bibliotecaria Médica del Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño San Borja. El Webinar permitió conocer las principales características de las normas y APA y Vancouver y conocer los manuales y guías elaborados por la UPC. Esta temática es de interés para estudiantes y docentes de todos los programas académicos que se encuentren en la elaboración de trabajos académicos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositorio Académico UPC (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas)Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207